Blog and Case Notes
The Human Rights Bill has passed in Queensland, to a shower of press releases and accolades. But what does it mean for you and your clients?
At a basic level, the Bill identifies 23 human rights, ranging from civil and political rights to economic, social and cultural rights. It introduces a number of systems and procedures to ensure that these rights are safeguarded.
The explicit human rights recognised are:
- Recognition and equality before the law
- Right to life
- Protection from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
- Freedom from forced work
- Freedom of movement
- Freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief
- Freedom of expression
- Peaceful assembly and freedom of association
- Taking part in public life
- Property rights
- Privacy and reputation
- Protection of families and children
- Cultural rights (generally)
- Cultural rights (Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples)
- Right to liberty and security of person
- Humane treatment when deprived of liberty
- Fair hearing
- Rights in criminal proceedings
- Children in the criminal process
- Right not to be tried or punished more than once
- Retrospective criminal laws
- Right to education
- Right to health services
The biggest impact will be on the Queensland Government itself, with a number of compatibility requirements for lawmakers and new obligations for […]
Isaac v Dargan Financial Pty Ltd ATF The Dargan Financial Discretionary Trust (ABN 68 702 047 521) (trading under the name of Home Loan Experts)  NSWCA 163
Building a business and client-database is no easy task. When an employee or contractor leaves, or threatens to leave, the names and contact details of clients assume supreme value. The fear is that this confidential information will fall into the hands of a competitor or the departing employee or contractor will use it for their own gain.
The first question is whether there were appropriate safeguards for this information during the employment or contractual relationship: for example, were client details password-protected and only imparted to employees or subcontractors under an express obligation of confidence, such as a confidentiality agreement? Were the employees only allowed to store client information on company-issued mobile phones or had their client relationships become enmeshed in their social media?
However, what happens if there is a dispute and these client lists are attached to an Affidavit, putting them into the public domain and into the hands of a competitor? A recent decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal demonstrates that simply attaching the client details to an Affidavit is […]
Mathieson v Lawson  QSC 154
The defendants had brought an application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim for want of prosecution. Leave had been granted nunc pro tunc to the plaintiff to bring derivative proceedings on behalf of the seventh defendant which was in liquidation at the time. The other defendants were not joined as parties to that proceeding.
The plaintiff sought to rely on the order made in that proceeding against the seventh defendant as a “step in the proceeding” within the UCPR contending that the order served the purpose of conferring leave to proceed for the purpose of both s 237 and s 500 of the Corporations Act, and further for the purpose of UCPR 371(2).
The court rejected that contention, concluding that an order made in a differently constituted proceeding could not be a “step in the proceedings”.