Hussain v CSR Building Products  FCA 392
NEED GOOD AUTHORITY for an unfair preferences matter? Look no further than this 2016 Federal Court case decided by Justice Edelman. […]
AN INSURER ESCAPED LIABILITY from indemnifying claims against its clients in liquidation proceedings. The Victorian Supreme Court found that the insurers’ liability was limited by the deed of settlement entered by its client, and that the client’s non-disclosure ultimately avoided all liability. […]
LIQUIDATOR SEEKING AN EXTENSION OF TIME for making an application under s 588FF(1) Corporations Act copped criticism for serving demands without conducting investigations. The application was made ex parte.
Justice Lee emphasised the importance of a liquidator serving a demand only once […]